What did it all
mean? Was the
Chicago
Seven Trial merely, as one commentator suggested, "a monumental
non-event"?
Was it, as others argue, an important battle for the hearts and minds
of
the American people? Or is it best seen as a symbol of the
conflicts
of values that characterized the late sixties? These are some of
the questions that surround one of the most unusual courtroom
spectacles
in American history, the 1969-70 trial of seven radicals accused of
conspiring
to incite a riot at the 1968 Democratic National Convention in Chicago.
Culturally and politically, 1968 was one of
the
most turbulent years America has ever seen. As the Vietnam war
became
the longest war in U. S. history, American casualties passed the 30,000
mark. When the Viet Cong mounted their Tet offensive, anti-war
protests
grew larger and louder on college campuses. At Columbia, students
seized the office of the President and held three persons hostage to
protest
the school's ties to the defense Department. Two Jesuit priests,
Phil and Daniel Berrigan, burned hundreds of draft records at a
Selective
Service center in Maryland. Following the April assassination of Martin
Luther King in Memphis, riots erupted in 125 cities leaving 46
dead.
After Senator Eugene McCarthy challenged incumbent President Lyndon
Johnson
over his support of the war, Johnson withdrew from the race. Senator
Robert
Kennedy entered the race after Johnson's withdrawl, only to be shot and
killed on the night in June that he won the California primary. "Hair,"
a controversial new musical about draftees and flower children,
introduced
frontal nudity to large audiences. Feminists picketed the Miss
America
pageant, black students demanded Black Studies programs, and Eldridge
Cleaver
published "Soul on Ice."
The Protests
Also in 1968, two groups met to discuss
using
the upcoming Democratic National Convention in Chicago to highlight
their
opposition to the Vietnam War and establishment values. Although there
was some loose coordination between the two groups, they had different
leadership, different agendas, and favored different forms of protest
and
demonstrations. The more politically focused of the two groups was the
National Mobilization to End the War in Vietnam (MOBE). The group
more focused on promoting an uninhibited lifestyle was the Youth
International
Party (YIPPIES). In addition to these two groups, organizations
such
as the Black Panther Party and the Southern Christian Leadership
Conference
also planned to have representatives in Chicago to press their
complaints
concerning racism in American policies and politics.
Rennie
Davis, the national coordinator for MOBE at the time of the
Convention,
first announced his intentions to come to the Democratic National
Convention
at a meeting of a group called "The Resistance" in November, 1967, at
Judd
Hall at the University of Chicago. Davis told the group that he
"wanted
the world to know that there are thousands of young people in this
country
who do not want to see a rigged convention rubber-stamp another four
years
of Lyndon Johnson's war." Three months later the newly-formed
MOBE
held a planning meeting in Chicago to debate four alternative
strategies
for the upcoming Democratic Convention: a mass disruption strategy, a
strategy
of uniting behind a peace candidate such as Senator Eugene McCarthy, a
"stay home" strategy, and a strategy of bringing as many anti-war
people
as possible to Chicago for demonstrations and teach-ins. The
group
of about forty, including attendees Davis and Tom
Hayden, generally supported the fourth strategy. In March of
1968, MOBE sponsored another meeting, this one at Lake Villa, a YMCA
Camp
near Chicago, to discuss plans for August. About 200 persons,
including
Chicago Seven defendants David Dellinger, Rennie Davis, Tom Hayden, Abbie
Hoffman, and Jerry
Rubin, attended the meeting. A twenty-one page document,
authored
by Hayden and Davis, was distributed at the meeting. The document
recommended non-violence.
Meanwhile, another group was making its own plans for
Chicago.
The "YIPPIES" were born, and plans for a "Festival of Life" in Chicago
first discussed, in December 1967. Plans for the Festival of
Life,
as they were developed by Yippie founders Abbie Hoffman and Jerry
Rubin,
called for a "festival of youth, music, and theater." In January,
the Yippies released an initial call to come to Chicago, called "A
STATEMENT
FROM YIP":
"Join us in Chicago in August for an
international
festival
of youth, music, and theater. Rise up and abandon the creeping
meatball!
Come all you rebels, youth spirits, rock minstrels, truth-seekers,
peacock-freaks,
poets, barricade-jumpers, dancers, lovers and artists!
"It is summer. It is
the
last
week in August, and the NATIONAL DEATH PARTY meets to bless Lyndon
Johnson.
We
are there! There are 50,000 of us dancing
in
the
streets, throbbing with amplifiers and harmony. We are making
love
in the
parks. We are reading, singing, laughing,
printing
newspapers, groping, and making a mock convention, and celebrating the
birth of FREE AMERICA in our own time.
"Everything will be
free.
Bring
blankets, tents, draft-cards, body-paint, Mr. Leary's Cow, food to
share,
music, eager skin,
and happiness. The threats of LBJ, Mayor
Daley,
and J. Edgar Freako will not stop us. We are coming! We are
coming from
all over the world!
"The life of the American
spirit
is
being torn asunder by the forces of violence, decay, and the
napalm-cancer
fiend. We
demand the Politics of Ecstasy! We are
the
delicate
spores of the new fierceness that will change America. We will
create
our
own reality, we are Free America! And we
will
not
accept the false theater of the Death Convention.
"We will be in
Chicago.
Begin
preparations now! Chicago is yours! Do it!"
Hoffman and Rubin continued, over the next several months
leading
up
to the Convention, to propose ever more wild plans for the Festival of
Life. Rubin announced plans to nominate a pig, Pigasus
the Immortal, for President. Hoffman talked about a
demonstration
of public fornication, calling it a "fuck-in." A Yippie Program,
distributed in August of 1968, urged Festival attendees to bring
"sleeping
bags, extra food, blankets, bottles of fireflies, cold cream, lots of
handkerchiefs
and canteens to deal with pig spray, love beads, electric toothbrushes,
see-through blouses, manifestos, magazines, and tenacity." The
program
promised poetry readings, mass meditation, "political arousal
speeches,"
fly casting exhibitions, rock music, and "a dawn ass-washing
ceremony."
There were also activities mentioned in the program that were somewhat
problematic for the alleged conspirators' trial defense:
"Psychedelic long-haired mutant-jissomed
peace
leftists
will consort with known dope fiends, spilling out onto the sidewalks in
pornape disarray each afternoon....Two-hundred thirty rebel cocksmen
under
secret vows are on a 24-hour alert to get the pants of the daughters
and
wifes and kept women of the convention delegates."
At trial, Hoffman suggested that the proposal of outlandish
events
in
the Yippie program and in speeches by Yippie leaders was simply a way
of
having "fun." He said that no one was expected to take the events
seriously [link
to Hoffman testimony].
Chicago officials, led by Mayor
Richard Daley, saw the Democratic National Convention as a grand
opportunity
to promote their city to the world. They resolved not to have
anti-war
demonstrators spoil their plans. Pre-Convention sparring between
the City and protest groups concerned the request of the Yippies to
allow
demonstrators to sleep in city parks. City Administrator Stahl
indicated
on August 5, 1968 that the request for permission to sleep in the parks
would be denied and that an 11 P.M. curfew would be enforced. On
August 23, officials ordered city police to post signs in parks
announcing
the curfew. As the Convention opening approached, Daley put the city's
12,000 police officers on twelve-hour shifts. In addition, 7.500
Army troops and 6,000 national guardsmen, requested by Daley to aid in
keeping order, arrived in Chicago.
In late August, mostly student-age anti-war and
counter-culture
activists
began arriving in Chicago. Several thousand would eventually
participate
in the Convention week protests (a number far below the 100,000-person
estimate that some organizers had predicted). Several days before
the convention, demonstration leaders began holding classes in Lincoln
Park on karate, snake dancing, and other means of self-defense.
Preparations
were woefully inadequate for the level of police violence that
demonstrators
would face. On Friday, August 23, MOBE learned that a federal
district
judge had denied their request for an injunction that would have forced
the city to allow use of the parks after 11 P. M.
The next day radical leaders held a contentious meeting to
discuss
whether
demonstrators should abide by the city's curfew. Among those
favoring
compliance with the curfew was Jerry Rubin; among those urging
violation
of the curfew was Abbie Hoffman. The first significant
confrontations
between demonstrators and protesters occurred that night. Some
people
were tear-gassed. A more serious confrontation with police was
avoided
when poet Allen Ginsberg led demonstrators out of Lincoln Park "Om-ing"
(chanting "Ommmmmm").
Sunday, August 25 was to be the much heralded "Festival of
Life"
featuring
rock music and Yippie revelry. Only the band MC5 showed up, but
even
they were reluctant to perform. They feared that police would
destroy
their sound system. The young people who gathered in the park on
Sunday evening handed out flowers, smoked pot, made out, and listened
to
poetry. About 10:30, a police officer with a bullhorn walked
through
the park saying, "The park is closing. If you stay in the park,
you'll
be arrested." Some young people, most of them local "greasers"
rather
than out-of-town protesters, threw objects at a police car.
At 11 P. M., police charged into the people still in the park,
teargassing
them and hitting them with billy clubs. The clearing of the park
continued
for hours. Some kids ran around smashing car windows and
vandalizing
buildings.
Police cracked more heads and fired more tear-gas grenades
again
the
next night. They attacked about 3,000 demonstrators gathered in
the
southeastern corner of Lincoln Park shortly after the 11 P. M.
curfew.
Testifying later about that night, Robert
Pierson, an undercover officer working as Hoffman's bodyguard, said
that the Yippie leader announced, "We're going to hold the park.
We're going to fuck up the pigs and the Convention." Shortly after
midnight,
Tom Hayden became the first of the alleged conspirators to be
arrested.
An officer spotted Hayden letting the air out of the tires of a police
car.
A half hour later, Rennie Davis (according to a prosecution undercover
witness) stood at the barricades in Lincoln Park with a megaphone
shouting
at people to "fight the pigs."
August 27 was another wild day in Chicago. It began
with a
sunrise
service of chants, prayers, and meditation in Lincoln Park, led by
Allen
Ginsberg. Bobby
Seale arrived in Chicago and addressed a crowd of about 2,000 in
Lincoln
Park. His speech, advocating a violent response to police,
was later made the basis for charging him with a violation of the 1968
Anti-Riot Act. Abbie Hoffman, furious with MOBE for its continued
advocacy of non-violence, allegedly met with the Blackstone Rangers to
persuade them to come to the park with weapons that night. In the
Chicago
Coliseum, about 4,000 persons gathered to hear David
Dellinger, folk singer Phil
Ochs, novelist William Burroughs and a variety of other peace
movement
celebrities. Shortly after 11 P. M., the nightly routine of
clubbing
and tear-gassing repeated in the park. Some enraged
demonstrators
smashed windows and streetlights.
Convention week violence peaked on Wednesday, August
28. The
day
began with Abbie Hoffman being arrested while having breakfast and
charged
with public indecency for having written the word "Fuck" on his
forehead.
(Hoffman said he did so to discourage the press from photographing
him.)
In the afternoon, Dellinger, Seale, Davis, and Hayden addressed 10,000
to 15,000 demonstrators at the bandshell in Grant Park, opposite the
Convention's
headquarters hotel, the Conrad Hilton. Tom Hayden allegedly told the
audience:
"Make sure that if blood is going to flow, let it flow all over the
city.
If we're going to be disrupted and violated, let the whole stinking
city
be disrupted. I'll see you in the streets!" Around 3 P.M., some
people
in the crowd lowered an American flag from a flagpole and attempted to
raise
a red flag in its place. When the police moved in to retrieve the
American flag, Jerry Rubin yelled "Kill the pigs! Kill the
cops!"
In another incident, Rennie Davis was clubbed into unconsciousness,
taken
to a hospital, then covered with a sheet and moved from room to room in
a successful effort to foil police who planned to arrest Davis during a
search of the hospital. That evening, in the Chicago Amphitheatre,
Democrats
nominated Hubert Humphrey as their candidate for President. Police
stopped
a nighttime march of about 1,500 people to the Amphitheatre. They
attacked
demonstrators with tear gas and clubs at numerous street
intersections
in the area.
The clubbing and the tear-gassing finally let up on
Thursday, but
protest
activities continued. Senator Eugene McCarthy and comedian Dick
Gregory
were among those who addressed a crowd in Grant Park. Police
undercover
officer Irwin
Bock met in the park with John
Froines and Lee
Weiner. Froines allegedly said that the demonstrators needed
more ammunition to use against police. Weiner reportedly then
suggested
Molotov cocktails, adding that a good tactic might be to pick a target
in the Loop and bomb it. Weiner told Bock and others to get the
bottles,
sand, rags, and gasoline necessary to make the Molotov cocktails.
The Trial
Until enactment of the 1968 Civil Rights Act, rioting and
incitement
to riot was a strictly local law enforcement issue. Congress,
however,
felt compelled to respond to the ever-increasing numbers of anti-war
protests
around the country. The new law made it a federal crime to cross
state lines with the intent to incite a riot. Even after passage
of the law, Attorney General Ramsey Clark and the Justice
Department
were reluctant to enforce the new provisions. Clark viewed what
had
happened in Chicago as primarily a police riot. The Attorney
General
expressed more interest in prosecuting police officers for brutality
than
in prosecuting demonstrators for rioting.
The Justice Department's lack of interest in prosecuting
protest
leaders
outraged Chicago Mayor Richard Daley. Daley convinced a close friend
and
federal judge, William Campbell, to summon a grand jury to consider
possible
violations of the anti-riot law. On March 20, 1969, the jury
returned indictments
against eight demonstrators, balanced exactly by indictments against
eight
police officers. The eight indicted demonstrators included Abbie
Hoffman, Jerry Rubin, David Dellinger, Tom Hayden, Rennie Davis, John
Froines,
Lee Weiner, and Bobby Seale. By the time the grand jury returned
its indictments, the Nixon Administration had begun. The new attorney
general,
John Mitchell, exhibited none of his predecessor's reluctance about
prosecuting
demonstrators. Mitchell gave the green light to prosecute.
On September 24, 1969, thirteen months after the riots that
shocked
America, the trial of the so-called "Chicago Eight" began in the
oak-panelled,
twenty-third-floor courtroom of Judge
Julius Hoffman. The 300 members of the panel of potential jurors
were
overwhelmingly white, middle-class and middle-aged. They reminded
author and trial observer J. Anthony Lukas of "the Rolling
Meadows
Bowling League lost on their way to the lanes." Defense attorneys
William
Kunstler and Leonard
Weinglass submitted to Judge Hoffman a list of fifty-four proposed
questions for potential jurors. They believed that the questions
might aid them in their use of juror challenges by revealing cultural
biases.
Among the questions the defense attorneys wanted to ask jurors were:
"Do
you know who Janis Joplin and Jimi Hendrix are?", "Would you let your
son
or daughter marry a Yippie?", and "If your children are female, do they
wear brassieres all the time?" Judge Hoffman rejected all but one
of the proposed questions, asking the jurors only "Are you, or do you
have
any close friends or relatives who are employed by any law enforcement
agencies?" (Later, the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals would cite the
judge's refusal to allow inquiry into the potential cultural biases of
jurors as a ground for reversing
all convictions.) Three hours after voir dire began, a jury
of
two white men and ten women, two black and eight white, was
seated.
It was clearly not a good jury for the defense. (After the trial,
one female juror commented that the defendants "should be convicted for
their appearance, their language and their lifestyle." Edward
Kratzke,
the jury foreman, also was angered by the defendants' courtroom
behavior:
"These defendants wouldn't even stand up when the judge walked in; when
there is no more respect we might as well give up the United
States."
A third juror expressed the view that the demonstrators "should have
been
shot down by the police.")
The defense and prosecution tables stood in dramatic
contrast.
At the defense table, defendants relaxed in blue jeans and sweatshirts,
often with their feet up on chairs or the table itself. Hoffman
and
Rubin favored attire that included headbands, buttons, beads, and
colorful
shirts. The defendants passed trial hours munching jelly beans,
cracking
jokes, offering editorial comments, making faces, reading newspapers,
and
sleeping. The area around the defense table was littered with
clothing,
candy wrappers, and even (on one day) a package of marijuana. The
prosecution table, behind which sat silver-haired District
Attorney Thomas Foran and his young assistant
Richard Schultz in their business suits, was, on the other hand, a
picture of neatness and efficiency. The prosecution table was
clear
of all but carefully arranged notes, a file of index cards, and a
pencil.
There was division in the defense ranks concerning trial
strategy.
Some of the defendants, such as Tom Hayden, wanted to play the trial
straight:
to concentrate on winning jurors by diligently pursuing weaknesses in
the
prosecution's case and by observing a degree of courtroom
decorum.
Others, such as Jerry Rubin and Abbie Hoffman, saw the trial as an
opportunity
to appeal to young people around the country. [Link to
interview with Hoffman about trial.] They wanted to turn
the trial into entertaining theater that would receive maximum
attention
in the press. To that end, the Yippies would spice up the days of
the trial by, for example, wearing judicial robes, bringing into the
courtroom
a birthday cake, blowing kisses to the jury, baring their chests, or
placing
the flag of the National Liberation Front on the defense table.
In his trial account The Barnyard Epithet an Other
Obscenities,
J. Anthony Lukas divides the Chicago Conspiracy Trial into five
"phases."
The first period, which Lukas calls "The Jelly Bean Phase," lasted from
September 24 to October 13. It was a relatively uneventful stage,
in which the defendants took a "gently mocking" stance toward the
trial.
The second period, the "Gags and Shackles Phase," lasted from October
14
to November 5. This phase by the defendants seeking to emphasize
political issues in the trial, perhaps because they were concerned that
the trial was being seen by their sympathizers as a mere joke.
Also
during this phase, Black Panther defendant Bobby Seale continuously,
and
in increasingly angry tones, insisted upon his right either to
represent
himself or to have the trial continued until his own counsel of choice,
Charles Garry (who was hospitalized for gall bladder surgery), could
represent
him. Seale hurled frequent and bitter attacks at Judge Hoffman,
calling
him a "fascist dog," a "pig," and a "racist," among other things.
On October 29, the outraged judge ordered Seale bound and gagged.
Finally, on November 5, Hoffman severed Seale from the case and
sentenced
him to four years in prison for contempt. The Chicago Eight
suddenly
became the Chicago Seven. Phase three, lasting from November 6 to
December 10, was called by Lukas "Government's Day in Court." It
was a relatively calm period with only nine contempts, as the
defendants
saw in a surprisingly weak prosecution case the opportunity for at
least
a hung jury if they could "cool it" and avoid turning the jury against
them. Phase four, from December 11 to January 22 was the "Sing
Along
with Phil and Judy Phase." This was the phase in which the
defense
presented its witnesses, a virtual "who's who" of the American left
from
the guru of the drug culture Timothy
Leary to radical poet Allen
Ginsberg to folk singers Phil Ochs, Arlo
Guthrie, "Country Joe" McDonald, Pete Seeger and Judy
Collins. The final phase of the trial, from January 23 to
February
7, Lukas called the "Barnyard Epithet Phase." It was a two-week
period
marked by increasingly bitter outbursts by the defendants and their
attorneys,
and by almost irrational overreactions by Judge Hoffman.
Forty-eight
contempts came in this shortest of the five trial phases.
The heart of the government's case was presented through the
testimony
of three undercover agents who had infiltrated radical ranks,
Irwin Bock, William
Frappolly, and Robert
Pierson. Pierson landed a job as Rublin's "bodyguard," while
Bock and Frappolly maneuvered their way into leadership positions in
"Vets
for Peace" and the S. D. S. (Students for a Democratic society).
The undercover witnesses described plots to disrupt traffic, takeover
hotels,
"sabotage" restrooms, and other "hit-and-run guerilla tactics."
The
government's case was aided substantially by Judge Hoffman who
consistently
ruled in favor of the prosecution on evidentiary disputes. For
example,
Hoffman allowed the government to introduce speeches of the defendants
made well before their arrival in Chicago when they tended to support
the
government's case, but ruled that the defense could not introduce
(because
they were "self-serving") pre-Convention documents that suggested
peaceable intentions. Throughout the presentation of the government's
case,
Thomas Foran played the straight man, while his younger associate,
Richard
Shultz, expressed outrage at defense behavior and--whenever the
opportunity
arose--went for the jugular. J. Anthony Lukas marveled that "Shultz
could
have made the first robin of spring sound like a plot by the Audobon
Society."
The defense through its witnesses tried to portray the
defendants
as
committed idealists who reacted spontaneously to escalating police
violence.
It suggested that what the prosecution saw as dangerous plots, such as
an alleged Yippie conspiracy to place LSD in the Chicago water supply,
were only play. The defense also attempted, without much success
because of Judge Hoffman's rulings excluding such testimony, to make
the
Viet Nam War an issue in the trial. The defense countered the
prosecution's
attempt to prove a conspiracy with evidence that the alleged
conspirators
never met as a group--and would have agreed upon little if they
had.
Defense witness Norman
Mailer probably made the point best when he said, "Left-wingers are
incapable of conspiracy because they're all egomaniacs." Abbie
Hoffman
made the same point more colorfully when he said, "Conspiracy? Hell, we
couldn't agree on lunch."
The jury had scarcely begun its deliberations in the Chicago
Conspiracy
Trial when Judge Hoffman began sentencing each of the defendants and
the
two defense attorneys, William Kunstler and Leonard Weinglass, to
lengthy
prison terms on 159 specifications for criminal
contempt. The specifications ranged from minor acts of
disrespect
(such as not standing for the judge) to playful acts (such as baring
rib
cages or blowing kisses to the jury) to insulting or questioning the
integrity
of the court ("liar," "hypocrite," and "fascist dog"). William
Kunstler,
who seemingly became a radicalized brother of his clients over the
course
of the trial, was sentenced by Hoffman to four years and thirteen days
in jail. One specification for Kunstler concerned an incident on
February 3 when he said "I am going to turn back to my seat with the
realization
that everything I have learned throughout my life has come to naught,
that
there is no meaning in this court, there is no law in this
court."
The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals later reversed all contempt
convictions,
ruling that contempt convictions resulting in more than six months in
prison
require jury trials.
The jury initially split, with eight jurors voting to
convict
defendants
on both the conspiracy and intent to incite riot charges and four
jurors
voting to acquit on all charges. Foreman Edward Kratzke
handed
a hung-jury message to the marshal to take to Judge Hoffman. The
judge's response: "Keep deliberating!" Juror Kay Richards finally
brokered
a compromise between the two jury factions. In the end, jurors
acquitted
all defendants on the conspiracy charge, while finding the five
defendants
charged with having an intent to incite a riot while crossing state
lines
guilty. The jury acquitted Froines and Weiner of the charge of
teaching
and demonstrating the use of an incendiary device.
On February 20, 1970, Judge Hoffman sentenced the five
members of
the
Chicago Seven found guilty by the jury. Each defendant made a
statement
before sentence was imposed. David Dellinger told Hoffman that he
was "a man who had too much power over too many people for too many
years,"
but that he admired his "spunk." Rennie Davis announced that when
he got out of prison he intended to "move next door to [prosecutor] Tom
Foran, and bring his sons and daughter into the revolution." Tom
Hayden offered the opinion that "we would hardly have been notorious
characters
if they left us alone on the streets of Chicago," but instead "we
became
the architects, the masterminds, and the geniuses of a conspiracy to
overthrow
the government-- we were invented." Abbie Hoffman recommended
that
the judge try LSD: "I know a good dealer in Florida [where the judge
was
soon to head for a vacation]; I could fix you up." Jerry Rubin
offered
the judge a copy of his new book Do It! with an inscription
inside:
"Julius, you radicalized more young people than we ever could.
You're
the country's top Yippie." After listening to each defendant give
his statement, Judge Hoffman sentenced each defendant to five years'
imprisonment
plus a $5,000 fine.
The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals reversed all
convictions on
November
21, 1972. The appellate court based its decision on the refusal to
allow
inquiry into the cultural biases of potential jurors during voir dire
as
well as Judge Hoffman's "deprecatory and often antagonistic attitude
toward
the defense." The court also noted that it was determined after
appellate
argument that the F. B. I, with the knowledge and complicity of Judge
Hoffman
and prosecutors, had bugged the offices of the Chicago defense
attorneys.
The Court of Appeals panel said that it had "little doubt but that the
wrongdoing of F. B. I. agents would have required reversal of the
convictions
on the substantive charges."
All seven Chicago police officers charged with violating the
civil
rights
of demonstrators were acquitted. Charges against an eighth
officer
were dismissed. Richard Shultz explained the verdicts by
observing,
"The people who sit on juries in this city are just not ready to
convict
a Chicago policeman."
There is no simple "yes" or "no" answer to the question of
whether
the
Chicago defendants intended to incite a riot in Chicago in 1968.
Abbie Hoffman said, "I don't know whether I'm innocent or I'm guilty."
The reason for the confusion--as Norman Mailer pointed out--was that
the
alleged conspirators "understood that you didn't have to attack the
fortress
anymore." All they had to do was "surround it, make faces at the
people inside and let them have nervous breakdowns and destroy
themselves."