Cross-examination by Hueston:
Q. Mr. Petrocelli asked Mr. Skilling, "Did you have one conversation with one person about getting your story straight? His answer was: "No.” I’ll pose that question to you, Mr. Lay: Did you have one conversation with one person about getting your story straight for trial?
A And again, could you elaborate on that, Mr. Hueston? I mean, what story are you talking about?
Q. Are you having trouble with that question? I’m just posing the same question?
A. Well, I'm not sure I – I’m telling stories up here. I'm up here to answer your questions.
contacted witnesses to get your story straight?
A. I – I – I don’t know that I contacted witnesses.
A. Do you know if I told Mr. Duncan, the chairman of that committee, about the Photofete situation?
Q. What we know and what you know, as the writer of those rules, is that telling one person-if it ever happened-does not satisfy your own rules . . .
A. I would think that the chairman of that committee, just like the chairman of any committee at Enron, can make a decision as to what he or she would like to do with that information or needs to do with that information.
Q. Even though that's not what's called for by the code of conduct that you wrote, right?
A. I think we're now getting into form over substance, Mr. Hueston.
Q. Well, that's what you would call your rules, then, form over substance, right?
A. No. The rules were very-very important. But, again, if I did notify Mr. Duncan, which I normally would have, then I would Jet him decide whether to take it up with the full committee or whether, in fact, it was even a large enough investment that he should take the time of the full committee.
Q. Right. The rules were important, but you didn't follow them?
A. Rules are important, but they should not-you should not be a slave to rules, either....
Q. One of the things your attorney said in opening was, quote, “He had real estate in Aspen. He could have sold his home up there. But that’s a long, tedious process; and he's got a wife and children to put up with."
Do you remember that statement?
A. I don't. I find the phrasing kind of interesting; but, no, I do not. I mean, he well may have said it.
Q. Selling property in Aspen, in fact, was not a long, tedious process for you, was it?
Q. And you didn’t list it until January 21st, 2002, after you sold all your Enron stock, right?
not sure exactly when it was listed; but it was certainly
after the bankruptcy....
Q. All right. Now, listing date was January 21st, right, sir?
Q. The contract date was just two days later. You had a sales contract in hand just two days later, didn't you?
A. Yes, we did. Apparently there was a potential buyer known to our real estate agent up there, that wanted the property; and-and that transaction was-was negotiated and sold very quickly.
Q. You got $10 million, the full asking price, within two days, right?
Q. And, in fact, it was an all-cash offer, as well, wasn’t it?
A. It was.
Q. Stock first, sales of real estate later?
Q. . . . [L]et's remind the jury of what you said when you were describing why it is that you felt you didn't have to tell the employees about these sales during this period of time ... And let's read this. "My personal belief is that Enron stock is an incredible bargain at current prices, and we will look back a couple of years from now and see the great opportunity that we currently have." And that’s the latter part of the quote where it mentions that you had been buying stock in the last couple of months. And then you answer: "Yes. And in fact, I had purchased the 4 million of shares, and I always separated the optional, discretionary decisions I was making with my money versus those ... that, in fact, were forced, as the margin calls were forcing the sale of some of the other shares." That's what you said, right?
A. Yes, it is.
Q. All right. Well, let's look at the choices that you had on July 26th.... [O]n July 25th your line of credit was getting a margin call for $483,000, correct, sir?
A. That appears to be, yes.
Q. And in response to that $483,426 margin call, you sold $4 million of Enron stock back to Enron, correct?
A. If I did go back to Enron on the line of credit, I usually would go for the full amount.
Q. [S]o what you're saying is, even though you had a margin call of just $483,000, you went ahead and used that margin call as a reason to draw a full $4 million down or to sell $4 million of Enron stock back to Enron, right?
A. I most usually would do that in order to have some additional liquidity versus whatever the margin call was.
Q. All right. So a good $3.5 million was not required by the margin call that day, correct?
A. Apparently not....
Q. So on July 26, sir, on this now familiar document, it indicates your total borrowing power on the secured lines was $9.5 million and in your unsecured lines below an additional $2.25 million. And so, in fact, you had over $11 million worth of borrowing options off your other lines of credit on that day available to you to satisfy that half-a-million-dollar or so margin call, correct?
Q. So, your choices on July 26th, sir, to meet the margin call of $483,426 was $11 million worth of balance availability and other lines of credit, right? That's in category choice number one and the very sort of choice that Mr. Herrold provided you that we saw by e-mail in May of 2001. Do you remember that?
A. I'm sorry. An e-mail by Mr. Herrold when?
Q. Remember the May, 2001, e-mail from Mr. Herrold advising you of a choice between accessing money from other lines of credit or selling back
Q. – Enron stock?
Q. So, that's choice number one, $11 million available?
Q. And choice number two, selling assets that were summing in excess of $13 million of non-Enron stock. That was also available as an option as well, correct?
A. That appears to be so.
Q. All right. So, sir, in sum, then, from July 26th through September 4th, when you sold $24 million of stock, you, in fact, had choices other than selling Enron stock during this period of time leading up to the online forum; isn't that right, sir?
There were other options,
Q. All right. Now, Mr. Beau Herrold assisted you in managing your finances?
A. He did.
Q. But you ultimately were in charge, correct? He took direction from you?
A. Well, certainly, I was-I could overturn any recommendation or decision that they were making. And-but they would try to run, certainly, the more important decisions by me if they could, I mean, if I was reachable. Quite often, if I was traveling, they had to go ahead and kind of do whatever they could do.
Q. Right. Well, one of the more important things would be to work with you to avoid selling any more shares than you had to during this time period. That would be important to you, correct?
A. Yes, it would . . .
Q. It’s an e-mail from Mr. Herrold to you, dated May 21st, 2001.
THE COURT: All right. It's admitted.
Q. I'll read it aloud. It's from Mr. Herrold to you, Mr. Lay, on May 21, 2001?
A. Yes. Yes, it is.
Q .... He gives you a choice in this e-mail, correct? ... "PW"-that would be your PaineWebber line-"has a deficit of about 2.1 million. We are on day three. We might have to fund the account around $2 million if it doesn't cure itself by tomorrow. Can we use the Enron line again now that it is paid off or would you rather use one of the other lines? B of A"-that's Bank of America-"has approximately $5.9 million available, which has the most availability of all the lines." He's asking you which choice you'd like to make here, right, sir, to pay off the $2 million that needs to be applied to the PaineWebber account?
A. Yes, he is.
Q. Okay. One choice was to use $5.9 million of available monies on your Bank of America line of credit, correct?
Q. And the other was to use money from your Enron line of credit, right?
Q. And when you're using the Enron line of credit, just so the jury is clear, you were paying it back with Enron stock, right?
A. Yes . . .
Q . . . So, the choice was clear here, was it not, sir: Sell Enron stock or use your Bank of America line of credit?