Law & Religion Syllabus: Fall Semester, 2021

 

SESSION 1 (Tuesday, Oct. 5)

Law and Religion from 1620 to 1880

READ: RELIGION AND LAW IN AMERICA: A HISTORY

The Trial of Anne Hutchinson (1637)(video lecture)

The Trial of Mary Dyer (1659-60)(for interest)

Salem Witchcraft Trials (1692) (for interest)

History behind the First Amendment’s Religion Clauses

Marsh v Chambers (1983)

The Joseph Smith Murder Trial (1845)(for interest)

The Supreme Court’s First Free Exercise Decision

Reynolds v United States (1878)

 

SESSION 2 (Tuesday, Oct. 12)

Law and Religion from 1880 to 1945

The Rise of Fundamentalism

READ: THE EVOLUTION/CREATIONISM CONTROVERSY

The Scopes Monkey Trial (1925)(video lecture)

Epperson v Arkansas (1968)

Edwards v Aguillard (1987)

The Jehovah’s Witnesses Flag Salute Cases: The Compelled Speech Doctrine

West Virginia v Barnette (1943) (video lecture)

Wooley v Maynard (1977)

 

SESSION 3 (Tuesday, Oct. 19)

Prayer, Religious Instruction, and the Public Schools

READ: INTRODUCTION TO THE ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE

McCollum v Board of Education (1948)

Engel v Vitale (1962)

Lee v Weisman (1992)

Santa Fe Indep. School District v Doe (2000)

Aid to Religious Schools (Vouchers & Scholarships)

Zelmen v Simmons-Harris (2002)

Locke v Davey (2004)

Disfavoring Student Religious Expression:

Widmar v Vincent (1981)

 

SESSION 4: (Tuesday, Oct. 26)

Excessive Entanglement

READ: EVALUATING RELIGIOUSLY-BASED OR MOVITATED LAWS

Larkin v Grendel's Den (1984)

Oregon v Rajneeshpuram (1984)

Presbyterian Church v Hull Church (1969)

Free Exercise: Rise of the Compelling State Interest Test

READ: THE RISE OF THE COMPELLING STATE INTEREST TEST

U. S. v Ballard (1944)

Sherbert v Verner (1963)

Yoder v Wisconsin (1972) (video lecture)

Frank v Alaska (1979)

Jensen v Quaring (1985)

 

SESSION 5: (Nov. 2)

The Limits of First Amendment Protection: Finding Secular Purposes and Narrowing Free Exercise Protection

McGowan v Maryland (1961)

Clayton v Place (1989)

Narrowing of Free Exercise Protection

READ: FREE EXERCISE: NARROWING OF PROTECTION

Employment Division of Oregon v Smith (1990)

 

SESSION 6: (Nov. 9)

Religious Symbols in the Public Sphere

READ: RELIGIOUS SYMBOLS IN PUBLIC PLACES

Lynch v Donnelly (1984)

County of Allegheny v ACLU (1989)

Van Orden v Perry (2005)

American Legion v American Humanist Ass’n (2019)

The “Government Speech” Doctrine:

Pleasant Grove City v Summum (2009)

 

SESSION 7 (Nov. 16)

Congress and the Courts: The Trend towards Greater Free Exercise Protection

READ: FREE EXERCISE: THE POST-SMITH CASES

Constitutional Protection for Free Exercise (“Targeting” Doctrine):

Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye v. Hialeah (1993)

Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia v Comer (2017)

Masterpiece Cakeshop v Colorado (2018)

Tandon v Newsom (2021)

Fulton v Philadelphia (2021)

Statutory Protection for Free Exercise (RFRA (1993) and RLUIPA (2000)):

City of Boerne v Flores (1997)

Burwell v Hobby Lobby (2014)

Holt v Hobbs (2015)